H o I want to continue with the dedicated to academic and non-formal training which is a part should not miss on a resume and, although it seems impossible, we present multiple appropriate forms and not all. I'll use a real example very end that I have encountered in more than one occasion and that will help us address all aspects.
From 59 to 64: Primary
From 64 to 65: Primary (1st and 2nd quarter)
College Boulevard González - Lleida
From 64 to 65: Primary (3rd quarter) - income
From 65 to 66: Primary - income
From 66 to 67: Elementary - 1 BA
From 67 to 68: Elementary - 2 of bachelor
From 68 to 69 : Elementary - 3 of bachelor
From 69 to 70: Elementary - 3 of bachelor
College Salesian san juan leon - Huesca
70 to 71: 1 clerkship branch electric
71 to 72: 2 of officialdom branch power
University Sevilla labor (1st fp. degree).
of 72 to 73: Elementary - 4 th degree (Night) College Academy
Valero - Pamplona
'll be with me that this presentation is chaotic . Highlight the one hand, the lack capitalization names. Denotes carelessness in the presentation.
I would also like to clarify that training should include formal higher than you have and it goes without saying more. Ie if you have a degree, to mention will suffice, no need to specify the primary and secondary studies and so on.
is useless to include studies that were started but have not been completed and, therefore, do not have yielded any official title because it creates doubt and contributed nothing of value. When I asked about studies in the interview you can explain why you began studies and not finishes. However, if at the time of the interview you find yourself pursuing a formal education, they do advise to mention, specifying that we study today. There
year by year to detail what was done. Simply detailing the year of production and the degree obtained , for example, Diploma in Nursing or Higher Degree in Computer Training.
For me, the proper order and required to appear are: the titer, the center where he studied and date of collection.
Example: Bachelor of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza in June 2000
Many people wonder if it is necessary to indicate the date of commencement of study; personally am of the opinion that it is recommended especially in those who do not provide professional experience because the interviewers are going to pay more attention to their training . When they bring experience studies are important but not as much.
Some people do not like to mention that cost them more time to finish the race. do not have to create a problem if everything is well explained . If you have been a parasite, you will need further explanation, but there are reasons, like having to work part time, caring for sick, own illness, which has meant not being able to devote time to study, with an explanation, is solved doubt.
What I do not recommend is to use abbreviations in their studies, especially if long did . It is always preferable to use the full format, as people who analyze your resume does not necessarily have to know what they mean.
When we go into the field of further education, another error is to make an exhaustive list of all studies undertaken, regardless of whether or not related to the job that choose. To me, it's a big mistake, because on the one hand indicates that they are using a standard CV and on the other hand, have tried to show that training in many fields but in any depth. Personally, I only mention those that have to do and help earn points to your candidature. Imagine
accounting for a position, the candidate Maria Gonzalez notes the following courses:
- Competency Management, General Accounting, Contaplus,
- Team Management, Personal Image and makeup,
- Contracts, payroll and social security and school monitors
"You think it is necessary to put them all ? Obviously, the answer is clearly no. "What else gives the interviewer that you have a personal image course and a school instructor ? It is information that is left over and no interest here.
But see another example inadequate.
sales techniques Course:
Professor David Román (rosemary & Associates) - Huesca.
negotiation skills course: Professor Ana Biru
Madrid. Hotel Expo Hotel (London).
First Ana S Biru "and called Madrid last name? "Valencia It was the lowest, lo and behold the tiny ? "The Expo Hotel was not a good hotel and put it in tiny ? Perhaps there was not a star and that capital is not given ... Jokes aside, this presentation leaves much to be desired. Misspellings leave a candidate in the wrong place, basically because it gives a picture of neglect.
Nor is it necessary to include the name of the teacher or trainer who taught the course. Interviewers are not listed with appropriate trainers and those without. Does not matter.
I say again that what matters should be the title of the course held, the center where they were, the number of hours and the year of implementation .
Example:
Purchasing Management - Federation of Employers of Huesca - (90 h) 2009
In Spain, the number of hours you have the courses is important for the interviewer to get an idea of \u200b\u200bhow much deepened in that matter; does not prove that she knows a lot about . Is not the same course of 30 hours 300.
course, all such tips are recommendations that you then you will have to analyze the appropriateness or not for you.
will continue in next post with professional experience.
0 comments:
Post a Comment